“Côte des Blancs.” The evocative name alone tells us this Champagne subregion is special. French for “Hillside of White,” it gets right to the heart of what makes it unique: subsoils so chalky, topsoils so thin, that the slopes are named for their coloring.
That’s a far cry from Champagne’s other most famous regions. The Montagne de Reims is, of course, named for the mountain of Reims. And the Vallée de la Marne, for the banks of the Marne River. Those are spectacular terroirs and make magnificent wines. But they are regions defined by natural landmarks, not a singular soil type.
Of course, Côte des Blancs could as easily refer to the subregion’s other striking difference, the Chardonnay grapes that constitute over 97% of the Côte’s plantings. No other part of Champagne has such a tight marriage between terroir and variety. But that’s no accident : that marriage of Chardonnay and the Côte’s ancient chalk in this northern setting is what gives the wines their distinctive, bright voice, their salinity, length and, of course, finely-etched minerality.
As important as they are, the Côte des Blancs isn’t just soil and grape. It is a special terroir in every respect. A single line of villages running north-south, with vineyards predominantly facing east towards the gentler morning sun, it’s a subregion that finds a quintessential cool-climate, acid-preserving ripeness. The fruit can be glorious, especially in warm years — but even then, the wines are taut, focused, finessed.
That distinctive voice can make us think of the Côte des Blancs as a monolith. Its relatively small size (just 12 miles long) adds to that sense. But as you’ll see from this month's selections, that’s just not the case.
These are two beautiful wines from different Côte des Blancs villages, each clearly an expression of the magic of Chardonnay on this iconic chalk. But the wines are from different sites, made by different growers with different goals in mind. So, it shouldn’t be surprising that when you get right down to what’s in the bottle, the differences are just as striking as the similarities.